Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #6601

closed

FT-4 write to radio leads to error message

Added by Rob Hunter about 5 years ago. Updated about 5 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
High
Category:
-
Target version:
Start date:
03/13/2019
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
4.00 h
Chirp Version:
daily
Model affected:
Yaesu FT-4XR
Platform:
All
Debug Log:
I read the instructions above:

Description

I have a FT-4XR (USA model). I can read the data from the radio. I then wrote back to the radio and got 'error' when I keyed up. Reading the data back to Yaesu's own software showed that the TX frequencies for the repeaters I had programmed were all set to 0 MHz

Actions #1

Updated by Daniel Clemmensen about 5 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Rob Hunter to Daniel Clemmensen
  • Priority changed from Normal to High
  • Estimated time set to 4.00 h
  • Platform changed from Windows to All

I Just saw this and I have reproduced it on my FT-4. I hope to fix it by this evening.

Actions #2

Updated by Daniel Clemmensen about 5 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 90

Well that was interesting. The radio insists that you store the txfreq == rx freq, even if you are not "split" (i.e., if the "duplex" field is + or -). Weird, since you duplicate the RX value. Oh, well, I don't have to understand what the Yaesu programmer was thinking, only what he actually did.

Patch submitted. will close bug when it hits the daily build.

Actions #3

Updated by Dan Smith about 5 years ago

Dan, I recently turned on keywords in redmine here, so if you reference your bug like this:

Fixes: #6601

Then redmine with automatically close it as complete with a reference to the commit once it gets applied to the tree.

Just FYI as it saves a step in cases where it makes sense.

Actions #4

Updated by Daniel Clemmensen about 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • % Done changed from 90 to 100

Thanks, Dan S. I will use that approach from now on. My thought was to wait until the daily build containing the fix was actually released, but automation and consistency are much better than developers making random decisions on bug closure.

Actions #5

Updated by Dan Smith about 5 years ago

It's totally fine if you want to do it that way, but it usually means we forget and leave bugs open that were fixed long ago.

Anyway, just one tool for the belt. If you follow up like you have been, it's really up to you.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF